Tuesday, November 15, 2011

What Would Vancouver's Top City Election Issues Be If We Were Not Pre-Occupied?

Gambling? Bike lanes? Transit? Sanitation? Poll shows voters still care about such things
Spotted at Occupy Vancouver - BC Lions ad - "Be More Than A Bystander" - Bill Tieleman photo
Bill Tieleman's 24 hours/The Tyee column

Tuesday November 15, 2011
By Bill Tieleman

"If you are not too large for the place you occupy, you are too small for it."

- James Garfield, U.S. president, 1831-1881

What would Vancouver's top issues be in Saturday's election if we weren't pre-Occupied?

Occupy Vancouver started exactly one month ago today on Oct. 15 with a large rally of more than 4,000.

Since then, Occupy Vancouver has dominated municipal election news, pushing out most reporting on other civic issues.
Now, a new Angus Reid Public Opinion poll says Occupy Vancouver -- which was intended to represent 99 per cent of the population -- has only 29 per cent of Vancouver residents viewing the protest favourably, while 64 per cent view it unfavourably.

And just 15 per cent believe it should be allowed to continue, while three-quarters either want the City to take legal action -- and a city injunction application resumes Wednesday in B.C. Supreme Court -- or set a deadline to clear the Vancouver Art Gallery lawn.

But regardless of what happened with Occupy, what about other key Vancouver issues?
Gambling: Vancouver city council voted against a huge downtown casino proposal in April. And last month Mayor Gregor Robertson went further:

"The Vision Vancouver council will implement a comprehensive moratorium on the expansion of gambling in Vancouver, and we will take a clear stand against the idea of a major casino in our dynamic downtown core," Robertson said.

But Vancouver's right-wing Non-Partisan Association has a split personality on gaming.

NPA mayoralty candidate Suzanne Anton also voted with Vision and the Coalition Of Progressive Electors against the casino, yet says she has always been in favour of a destination casino in Vancouver.

"I said I would have supported expanded gambling, and that I was very worried that this project was going down and the jobs that might be lost," Anton said.

Anton may have to explain her position to NPA candidate Sean Bickerton, co-founder of the Vancouver Not Vegas Coalition, which fought the casino plan.

Bickerton: "I opposed it then, I oppose it now, and I will oppose it in the future."

But Anton's flip-flopping problems don't end there.

Bike lanes: Vision got a lot of flak for introducing designated bike lanes on the Burrard Street Bridge, Hornby and Dunsmuir Streets. But the Angus Reid poll shows Vancouver council gets 62 per cent approval for that move.

Maybe that's why bicyclist Anton voted in favour of the Hornby bike lane, then the next morning wanted to rescind her vote and now says the NPA would impose a moratorium on any new bike lanes.

Even former NPA councillor Gordon Price had to point out Anton's hypocrisy on bike lanes last year.

"If you don't like the party, you criticize the process," Price said. "She does not want, I would guess, to criticize the idea of the bike lanes in principle, but also wants to support critics because she's 'in opposition."

Environment: Vision's Robertson says he wants to make Vancouver the world's "greenest city" and COPE supports that.

Anton's NPA platform says Vancouver is "already a world leader when it comes to being a green and environmentally sustainable city. Our NPA team will build on that legacy."

But Anton voted against the greenest city plan, calling it "too ambitious" and railing against the City allowing residents to keep chickens -- something New York and many other major cities do -- and attacking City support for homeowners growing wheat instead of grass on their lawn.

Anton's over-the-top hostility brought her thinly veiled criticism from former NPA councilor and 2008 mayoralty candidate Peter Ladner, who has just authored a new book called Urban Food Revolution.

"Politicians and candidates be warned: Ridiculing urban farming is a no-win strategy," Ladner wrote in his Business In Vancouver newspaper column in September after NPA attack ads against Vision's policies began airing on radio. "Food security is marching up the priority list in cities around the world, and Vancouver should be leading, not resisting, this movement."

Transit: The centrepiece of Anton's campaign -- before Occupy Vancouver took over -- is an odd and expensive plan to build a downtown streetcar line connecting Granville Island with Waterfront Station at cost of over $100 million.

The proposal, unveiled in September, says an NPA government would create a project task force in its first 60 days and "prepare a request for expressions of interest to potential private sector partners including the development community, transportation sector and B.C. corporate sector."

backgrounder released by the NPA talks about costs and potential ridership, but doesn't mention TransLink -- the regional public transit authority -- or who would operate the line.

City engineer Peter Judd told city council in September that: "It's not a project that the City would pursue on its own -- it's a project that has to be pursued integrally with TransLink."

But Anton disagrees: "The streetcar is my priority -- I am very confident that the streetcar can be built. The reason it's being framed in that way is because this council has given no direction and no support for a private partnership. I believe it can be done with private partnership."

It is interesting to note that the NPA election campaign chair and key fundraiser is Peter Armstrong -- executive chairman, founder and principal of the Armstrong Group, owner and operator of the Rocky Mountaineer rail tour business.

And outgoing NPA Park Board Commissioner Ian Robertson is spokesperson for the Armstrong Group.

Rocky Mountaineer has been using replacement workers to continue its luxury rail travel operations since employees represented by Teamsters Local 31 were locked out in June in a contract dispute.

The Armstrong Group bought bus tour operator Gray Line West from Greyhound Canada in 2005, but shut the Vancouver operation down in 2007, with the NPA's Robertson saying there was competition from other tour bus companies and too many options available for tourists in Vancouver. About 80 workers -- also represented by Teamsters Local 31 -- were put out of work.

By comparison to Anton's privately-partnered streetcar plan, Vision Vancouver promised this month to work for new and expanded public transit services.

COPE also supports increased transit, proposing TransLink create a "C-Pass" or community pass, building on the success of the U-Pass for university and college students.

COPE states that it would work to bring the HandyDart buses for people with disabilities under public ownership through TransLink instead of it continuing to be a privately contracted service.

Mayor Robertson joined Surrey Mayor Diane Watts, North Vancouver Mayor Darrell Mussatto and other mayors last month in voting to support TransLink's Supplemental Budget plan, which will use a new two cent a litre gasoline tax to build the Evergreen Line, increase bus and SeaBus service by 415,000 service hours and make other transit improvements.

Anton did agree with Vision and COPE councillors to unanimously endorse that position.

Clear differences

But looking at the issues makes clear that significant policy differences exist between Vision Vancouver and COPE and their NPA opponents.

Similarly wide disagreements also exist in the parties' policies at the Vancouver Board of Education and Park Board.

It's Anton's positions on key city council issues like these that led former NPA campaign manager Bob Ransford to endorse Robertson for mayor, with a stinging denunciation of not only Anton but her "common sense" NPA team.

"Suzanne Anton and the NPA have the wrong priorities for Vancouver. The current NPA candidates are inexperienced, constantly contradicting one another, and have run a highly negative campaign, instead of one focused on the big issues in Vancouver. "It's too risky for voters to support Suzanne Anton and the NPA in this election on Nov. 19."

And Anton's approach had Daniel Fontaine, the former chief of staff to NPA Mayor Sam Sullivan,predicting in late October that she faced a "very slim chance of winning" -- before the Occupy Vancouver issue began to dominate coverage and the NPA's cynical strategy to overcome a weak candidate's flaws.

But Fontaine, co-founder of NPA-friendly blog City Caucus with now NPA council candidate Mike Klassen, did make clear the party's strategy is to attempt to gain majority control of council.

"But what is most at risk for the mayor is controlling that council. The way our council works is if you don't have six seats in council, you're a weak mayor," Fontaine told the Vancouver Sun.

Get out and vote

Looking back to the Angus Reid poll also shows the likely real reason Anton is riding the anti-Occupy Vancouver issue.

When it comes to providing good sanitation services -- which 93 per cent of Vancouver residents say is the most important issue -- 77 per cent think the City is doing a very good or good job.

While that doesn't mean Vision Vancouver and its political partners COPE will clean up on the NPA on Nov. 19, it does show the opposition party definitely won't be sweeping the polls either.

So don't think your vote won't make a difference on Saturday or in advance polls. Regardless of who you support, exercise your democratic right to choice who governs Vancouver.

Bill Tieleman is a Vision Vancouver supporter and a consultant whose clients include a union representing transit workers, which was not consulted about this column. 



Rusty M said...

Lets not confuse issues here. When you say only 29 percent support the protesters, that does NOT mean only 29 percent support the cause.

Don't confuse the messenger with the message.

Removing the protesters from the Art Gallery is only a bandaid solution. Removing the protesers from the Art Gallery will NOT remove the cause ... the cause will not go away.

Anonymous said...

Removing the protesters from the Art Gallery is only a bandaid solution. Removing the protesers from the Art Gallery will NOT remove the cause ... the cause will not go away.

The cause won't go away, but the protestors are hardly part of the solution. Many of them are hypocrites. A few ended up being a problem.

At least shovelling out the protestors will make room for the annual lighting of the Menorah and soon after the Christmas Tree.

Vancouver doesn't not need to be perpetually have left wing misery burned into our collective retinas day after day.

The problems will sort themselves out.

Without the protestors.

DPL said...

Legal protest is good, but having a bunch of tents occupy space, with no one in them is rather silly. Don't the so called campers know that the cops, fire department and bylaw control officers check out such things.One wonders how many of the campers actually get around to voting, one way or the other

Anonymous said...

"The problems will sort themselves out.

Without the protestors."

Sure, just like slavery, women's ongoing struggle for equality, basic human rights for most of the citizens of the world... what a spectacularly idiotic statement.

Rusty M said...

Just consider the occupy site as a spent shell casing ... the purpose of the occupy was to raise awareness of corporate greed, unfair taxation and the like, and in that sense it was a huge success.

I forget the cliche, (something about putting toothpaste back in a tube or an elephant in the room or something) but the occupy movement has served its purpose well.

The revolution has begun and there is no stopping it ...

Anonymous said...

A question, not an accusation just a clarifying question. Has Suzanne Anton gone on record in saying her campaign chairman and fund raiser Peter Armstrong who runs a railway, will not be allowed to have his company bid on Suzanne's streetcar?

ie conflict of interest and prevention of crony capitalism?

To be clear I'm not accusing him of doing anything like that. I just want her to go public that specific insider crony capitalism won't be allowed if she wins and I haven't seen anyone asking that question

Anonymous said...

Sure, just like slavery, women's ongoing struggle for equality, basic human rights for most of the citizens of the world... what a spectacularly idiotic statement.

Such issues were not resolved by camping out on public property and making a mess of it, and having someone die in such an encampment because "progessive" protestors couldnt even take care of one of their own.

The protest movement called Occupy has NOT resulted in any changes. Absolutely none.

Anonymous said...

To the person that posted this

"The protest movement called Occupy has NOT resulted in any changes. Absolutely none."

Yes there have been changes, there is more discourse on the issues now.

People are reading and talking and thinking now. If your main view of the world is shaped by corporate media, you might not know this though.

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

Yes there have been changes, there is more discourse on the issues now.

Wrong. there has been no deviation from what the protestors want. None. Look at the United States and tell us exactly where the migation of wealth has gone within the past 60 days.

People are reading and talking and thinking now. If your main view of the world is shaped by corporate media, you might not know this though.

If your main view of the world is shaped by Loonie Left Wing Ideaology, you might know this though.