Tom Mulcair and Justin Trudeau |
Bill Tieleman’s 24
Hours Vancouver / The Tyee
column
Tuesday April 12, 2016
By Bill Tieleman
"A man who is used to acting in one way never changes; he
must come to ruin when the times, in changing, no longer are in harmony with
his ways."
- Niccolò
Machiavelli, The Prince, 1532
Tom Mulcair went into his New Democratic Party convention on
Sunday as a man out of time after the disastrous results of the 2015 federal
election -- and delegates stunningly punched the clock on his leadership.
Mulcair didn't make a convincing case that he had changed and
learned from his errors, and with the times changing rapidly under Liberal
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, he indeed came to ruin.
Politics is an unforgiving business when one fails, as Mulcair fully
knew, but even veteran observers were shocked after numerous pundit predictions
that the NDP leader would leave convention either unscathed or mildly wounded.
Instead, Edmonton delegates delivered a politically fatal blow,
not willing to take any chances that Mulcair might survive long enough to
regroup and regain sufficient support to contest a 2019 rematch with Trudeau.
Despite Mulcair's acknowledged success grilling former prime
minister Stephen Harper in Parliament while Trudeau was busy finding followers
on Twitter, he and the NDP discovered too late that it is constant campaigning,
and not accumulating House of Commons accolades, that gets you elected.
Fifty-two per cent of New Democrats at convention voted in
favour of a leadership vote -- a result that, when announced on national
television, left delegates in solemn silence.
And just like that, the NDP came to a fork in the road and chose
a direction without a clear indication where it will lead, or who will lead it.
A leap in the dark
More obviously, they have taken a leap into the dark -- endorsing the
Naomi Klein-Avi Lewis led LEAP Manifesto that was vigorously denounced
by Alberta NDP Premier Rachel Notley as detrimental to the economy and jobs but
backed by a slim majority at convention, due to environmentalist members.
Notley made an impassioned and impressive speech
to delegates Saturday, calling on them to back Alberta as the province whose
natural resource revenues have supported Canada for many years in good times.
"We're not making a choice between the environment and the
economy. We are building the economy," Notley said.
"I'm asking you to leave here more persuaded than perhaps
some of us have been, that it is possible for Canada to have a forest industry,
to have an agriculture industry, a mining industry, and yes, an energy
industry, while being world leaders on the environment."
And Notley asked NDP delegates to support building pipelines to
B.C. to export oil.
"We need to be able to get the best possible world price
for the oil we produce here, at the level of production that will be
responsibly allowed under a climate change plan. And the way to do that is
through pipelines to tidewater," Notley said.
Not an easy sell -- and one that delegates rejected in favour of
the LEAP Manifesto's hard-left politics
that call for no energy development "if you wouldn't want it in your
backyard," no new oil pipelines, cancelling all trade deals that
"that interfere with our attempts to rebuild local economies," and
much more.
Notley was having none of that, preferring real power to
pontification.
"We're acting, really acting, on the basis of a concrete
plan that is actually being implemented. That is what you get to do when you
move up from manifestos, to the detailed, principled, practical plans you can
really implement by winning an election," Notley told delegates.
Pipeline provocations
But Mulcair himself appeared desperately ready to leap to save
his leadership, telling
CBC TV he'd "do everything" he could to keep oil in the ground if
delegates agreed.
That only alienated his host Albertan New Democrats and private
sector unionists who had supported his leadership -- at the very convention
that decided his fate.
But it again illustrated Mulcair's fatal failings
as a politician -- a propensity to make snap decisions without full consideration
or consultation, and with disastrous consequences.
Mulcair's election announcement boasting that the NDP would
balance every budget despite a shaky economy, when Canadians weren't looking
for fiscal austerity from a social democratic party, was his campaign's
terrible turning point.
Trudeau pounced on it, promising modest deficits to pay for
infrastructure and other spending that Mulcair's penny-pinching would prohibit
-- "real change now," as the Liberals claimed.
But now it's the NDP that seeks real change -- in a new leader
for troubled times.
.
4 comments:
This country also needs a press that is unbiased. The MSM was totally against the NDP. In the future we may have to rely on the reporters and news outlets (like The Tyee) on the internet.
Dear Bill:
I fully agree with your analysis of the defective Leap Manifesto. Though it has some good points, it was a tactical blunder of the first magnitude to bring it up at a leadership convention. However, the manifesto did have the salutary effect of exposing deep structural problems within the NDP.
I would appreciate your comments on this analysis of the electoral crash and burn.
Will failure teach the NDP anything?
http://www.gregfelton.com/canpol/2016_06_11.htm
Many thanks,
Greg Felton
gregfelton@shaw.ca
Thanks for your comment Greg and I have read your analysis. I am fundamentally opposed to the Leap Manifesto however and the idea of joining a party led by Elizabeth May is beyond my comprehension. Nor do I want a new name for the NDP. I do agree with some of your other points about needing to be bold.
Thanks for reading, Bill, and I appreciate your comments. I agree that the manifesto was a disaster but it did create rifts in the NDP that may not be bridgeable. Some people I know have torn up their NDP membership over the turfing of Mulcair and the manifesto. In that light, how do you see the NDP recovering under its present name and with no definable energy philosophy? Does it not need to redefine itself?
Thanks,
Greg
Post a Comment