Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Will BC NDP convention affirm move to centre, appeal to business as strategy to defeat BC Liberals?

Is the BC NDP betting on business or social democracy to win power?

Moe Sihota wants business support and is likely the next party president

Bill Tieleman's 24 hours/The Tyee column

NDP needs to find own path

By Bill Tieleman

November 24, 2009

"Some automatically assume that we're going to be on opposite sides. But I think that's wrong."

-- NDP leader Carole James to Business Council of B.C., March 2009

Vancouver Sun columnist Vaughn Palmer thinks I'm a "crackpot."

Global Television's Keith Baldrey thinks I'm a "class warfare advocate."

And The Province's Michael Smyth thinks I'm "crazy."

But all of them agree with the views of Moe Sihota, the former NDP cabinet minister who will likely become the party's new president at this weekend's convention.

So why am I seen as so outrageously wrong by my political commentator friends?

Because I believe the New Democratic Party has to move to the populist left to win the next election, not to the mushy centre with a futile effort to gain business support.

But that's apparently the opposite direction to where James and Sihota plan to go.

Chasing 'market share'

Here's what Sihota told Smith this month when asked if James' leadership is a problem.

"I don't think leadership is the issue with the NDP. I think market share is the issue," Sihota said.

"For the NDP to be successful, it needs to have stronger relations with all sectors of the business community," he
said. "We need to get past the imagery of the party that has been created in a very polarized province."

That corresponds with Palmer's view, as stated on CKNW May 15.

"These people are crackpots! 'Cause here's their strategy summarized, right? We're going to move to the left, we're going to get our people really happy and we're going to win an election with 39 or 40 per cent of the vote," Palmer told Bill Good.

"James should put the people that make those arguments on call block at party headquarters," he added.

'Smarter than that'

Baldrey had the same view.

"Yes, there's the class warfare element of the NDP that thinks that's how to win power in the province because they did it once in 1996 where the vote was split big time -- the Reform Party was able to get nine points -- that's a lot of voters and that's what gave Glen Clark the election, it wasn't his assault on the banks," Baldrey said on the same show.

"But there are class warfare advocates in the NDP who think, 'Oh, if we just move hard left we’re going to win.' And there's just not enough voters out there," Baldrey said.

"Unfortunately, some of the people who say Carole James should remain are also the people saying we have to move left, push her left. Carole James, I'm afraid, everybody, is not a hard left wing politician," he added

Host Bill Good replied: "She's smarter than that."

Baldrey concluded: "She's smarter than that, she’s a centrist, centre-left and if they try to push her to that side of the political spectrum, I think she'll fall off."

Call me crazy

And on election night on CKNW, Smyth and Christy Clark, the former B.C. Liberal deputy premier and now talk show host, both replied that I was "crazy" for suggesting the NDP now had to move left to win.

So am I a crazy, crackpot class warrior? And, given that I was communications director to Glen Clark in the upset 1996 election, am I just trying to use the same playbook?

I strongly disagree, and actually have run my own business for 12 years, but you can be the judge.

Here's the first problem with the strategy outlined by Sihota, followed previously by James and endorsed by the punditocracy -- it doesn't and won't work.

The overwhelming majority of B.C.'s business community -- to put it simply -- hates the NDP's guts. Always have and always will.

But it's not personal -- it's common sense. The business community has its own party -- the B.C. Liberals -- that ably represents its interests in government.

The NDP can at best -- or worst -- only be a pale imitation of the real thing, a party of business.

Where the lines are drawn

While those advocating the NDP "increased market share" will say they want to represent "all" British Columbians, business and labour, rich and poor, working people and entrepreneurs, the truth is that neither the NDP nor any other party can successfully do that.

Politics is about choices, and business, to both its credit and advantage, has made a smart decision that the B.C. Liberals are their party.

What the rest of the population needs is a social democratic party that stands up equally strongly for their quite different interests, not a "me too" business wannabe.

Just look at a few key issues where business wins with the Liberals and loses with the NDP and you can easily see why real political lines are drawn in this province.

The minimum wage. The NDP want to raise it to $10 an hour. Business, especially small businesses, retail, restaurant and other sectors -- adamantly opposed the higher costs and so the B.C. Liberals have delivered, with no increase in eight years and none likely this term.

Labour laws. The NDP would want to make organizing workers easier for unions and decertification harder. Business got exactly the opposite changes from the B.C. Liberals in their first term, resulting in fewer unionized workers.

Social assistance. Welfare and disability benefits rates have
languished under the B.C. Liberals, which helps pay for their significant business tax cuts.

Workers' compensation. Benefit and eligibility cuts at WorkSafe B.C. have reduced payments to injured workers and therefore lowered premiums paid by business.

Private power. The B.C. Liberals banned B.C. Hydro from all new small power projects while subsidizing the independent power producers by paying rates enormously higher than the cost from existing publicly-owned hydroelectric dams. This huge giveaway and the privatization of one-third of B.C. Hydro's operations has put millions in private companies' pockets at consumers' expense.

Money talks

There are many more issues where the NDP's traditional positions are at odds with the interests of the business community.

That's why business has massively funded Gordon Campbell's party. In the 2005 election year, the B.C. Liberals
report on political contributions ran 999 pages and totalled an astonishing $13,112,445.

And $10,116,354 of that amount came from businesses for an amazing 77 per cent corporately-funded party.

Meanwhile the NDP's
report was almost as long at 985 pages, but total donations were just $7,543,220 -- $5.6 million less than the B.C. Liberals.

And business contributions added up to $238,769 -- $9.9 million less than the B.C. Liberals and amounting to just three per cent of their total. Individuals donated $5.2 million or 69 per cent and unions just over $2 million or 26 per cent.

We don't have full-year statistics for 2009, but during the election reporting period, the NDP raised $5.13 million and the B.C. Liberals $9.07 -- with $6.6 million coming from business, or about 73 per cent.

So presuming the new NDP approach is to cozy up to business, how can that be done without dramatically changing long-held values and risking the loss of its existing political base?

The answer is that it can't.

Learning from 2009

The failed results of the NDP's centrist strategy were evident in the 2009 election, as I have
written previously.

The number of NDP voters actually dropped by 40,377 in the
2009 election compared to 2005, indicating a failure to motivate its base. Moving more to the centre again hardly seems a winning strategy.

And while energizing all potential New Democrat voters -- maximizing the universe, in campaigning terms -- won't necessarily mean it gains a greater percentage of votes than the NDP achieved in 2005 or 2009, 41.5 per cent and 42 per cent -- what's clear is that neither of those efforts succeeded in winning government.

Ironically perhaps, and as both Palmer and Baldrey discussed May 15, is that the NDP has won election
three times -- in 1972, 1991 and 1996 -- with lower vote percentages than in 2005 or 2009 but a split right-wing vote.

The NDP can't create a viable right-wing third party to split that vote with the B.C. Liberals, but it can play its own best game based on social democratic values that bring out its voters instead of leaving them sitting on their hands or reluctantly voting for the Green Party.

And by running hard on its core values, the NDP potentially encourage other voters to demand the same kind of choice -- including a viable rural, right-of-centre party that rejects much of the B.C. Liberal approach.

Define the differences

But all of this is not to say that the NDP adopting a hard left, anti-business approach would work.

In fact, the "Take Back The Party" group is urging a significant shift left for the NDP in espousing dogmatic language and marginalized platform ideas that would be a
recipe for disaster.

No, what's needed is to honestly define the differences between the NDP and business and be clear about why they exist -- and how the NDP would fairly but firmly deal with them.

And there are some issues where the NDP can indeed win business support, most notably the Harmonized Sales Tax and its looming negative impact on a wide range of small businesses and the restaurant, hospitality and home building sectors.

Carole James and her caucus deserve strong credit for
fighting the HST -- it’s not only a tax that will hurt consumers during a recession without putting a dime into public services -- it's also a potential game-changing issue that could defeat both Premier Gordon Campbell and Ontario Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty, who is also introducing an HST.

The NDP can also appeal to business people who support a fair minimum wage, who don't believe B.C. should have the lowest child poverty rates in Canada for six straight years and who believe injured workers and the poor should subsidize corporate tax cuts.

But major businesses and their organizations -- from the Business Council to the B.C. Chamber of Commerce to the Independent Contractors and Businesses Association -- will all continue to donate heavily to the B.C. Liberal Party in hopes of defeating an NDP that would take measures opposed by business.

And no amount of NDP handwringing about wanting to appeal to business or visits to corporate headquarters will ever change that.

* * * * *

Parting with CKNW

Regrettably, I am no longer appearing Mondays on CKNW AM 980's Bill Good Show -- see my blog for



Unknown said...

Hey Bill excellent piece.

Unlike you, however, many of us working class self-employed folks have absolutely no respect for the Baldreys, Smiths and Goods (that's a laugh) and the corporate elites they brown-nose to and their oppressive, destructive and fundamentally stupid corporate capitalist economics.

You can learn more from listening to a dog bark than from any of those types. The fact that since these BC Liars took office in 2001, BC went from the overall highest living standards to among the lowest shows that all they understand about running an economy is sucking money out of it and lining the pockets of their corporate parasite buddies who fund them (which is why they fund them). That's a "boom" by their definition.

So the question then becomes: can the NDP move "left" (whatever that means) back to its socialistic roots without being "anti-business?"

The answer is definitely YES--depending on how you define "business."

Too often, thanks to the brain-washing efforts of the corporate media, when we use the term "business" we automatically assume it means corporations, banks, commercial landowners, elite investment agencies, big administrative bureaucracies of various types and other oppressive capitalistic institutions--along with their medieval trickle-down economic idiocy.

But the truth is there are much more diverse and useful types of business out, many of which were started or inspired by the NDP and labour: credit unions, cooperatives of various types, employee-owned and union-sponsored ventures, community economic development, sustainable "green" businesses and the non-profit sectors, as well as legions of self-employed workers and owner-operators--many of them union members--and the general practices of economic democracy, sustainability and mutual satisfaction of individual growth and interest via cooperation and equal rights.

These are the types of socialistic oriented businesses that do the most good (just look at any country where these are more dominant) and which the NDP must cultivate (or re-cultivate, since as the CCF this relationship was much stronger)--not only in getting more support, but to actively promote these as a better alternative to corporate rule and trickle-down stupidity.

Otis Krayola said...

So how do you square your 'leftish' leanings provincially with your continued support for Vision (also known as NPA Lite) on the civic scene?

Anonymous said...

It amazes me that the mainstream media has taken this long to figure out that you are a crazy crackpot Bill. Most of us knew that years ago.

Baldrey nailed it when he stated "Yes, there's the class warfare element of the NDP that thinks that's how to win power in the province because they did it once in 1996 where the vote was split big time -- the Reform Party was able to get nine points -- that's a lot of voters and that's what gave Glen Clark the election, it wasn't his assault on the banks," Baldrey said on the same show.

I realize that Tieleman’s fragile ego must cling to the notion that it was the looney go hard left strategy but it really was the split vote. Still I agree do agree with Tieleman that going left is the only place left to go. Carole James is delusional if she thinks the business crowd is ever going to vote NDP.

I am going to go with Schreck the NDP need a new and real leader and Carole James must go. Derek Corrigan should step up and take the bull by the horns.

Rod Smelser said...

The overwhelming majority of B.C.'s business community -- to put it simply -- hates the NDP's guts. Always have and always will.


This is, of course, the very same argument and almost the very same wording in fact to that used by millionaire MP Svend Robinson at a Federal Convention in 2000 when he vehemently denounced Bill Blaikie and Alexa MacDonough and Nelson Riis as "the mushy middle".

It seems to be part of some kind anti-Tony Blair/anti-Bill Clinton thingy, and one that started long before there was any Iraq War for the UK or anyone else to participate in, and therefore had nothing whatsoever to do with that war.

Anonymous said...

We certainly agree with the position you have taken re the NDP.
With Moe and James at the helm they will continue on a downhill slide. This moving to the center, does that mean they will not be taking issue with,ROR projects,BC Hydro.fish farms etc. Do they want to blend in with a very corrupt capitalistic system?
This recession has been 10 years in the making.and it was not designed to help the working man.
It's time we had a government that will take issue with corruption

Walter Lippman said...

The FPTP electoral system is a big culprit. It forces politicians to the centre, forces a lowest-common denominator approach to campaigning. Real, consistently principled politicking under FPTP are anomalies, freaks of political nature. You'll never see great socialist populists like Tommy Douglas rule a province again in Canada. You might under a PR voting system, but not under FPTP.

Bill, your homage to old Saskatchewan Waffle nostalgia, while attractive and honourable, is but that - nostalgia, a thing of a bygone era. Which leads to another big culprit:

Corporate classes have mastered so magnificently the engineering of consent in this all-consuming consumer culture we inhabit now - to a point that we've been distracted about as far away from class consciousness as we've ever been. When was the last time you even heard an NDPer other thanyourself utter the term 'working class'? It's now the homogeneous "working families," "working poor," "average Canadians" or "Joe Sixpack." How do you ever expect voters to vote according to their class when they've been convinced by their own political allies that there are no more classes, just some happy middle in which most of us magically fall into and live happily ever after, especially if we are able to purchase things that make us feel good and give us status?

Now, a sharp, PR minded man like you... If you can find some new, clever way to use Bernaysian techniques to make class fashionable and desirable in the minds of these average families, and commodify it politically, you might be able to change the world toward the true left. But I'm not holding my breathe.

Add to this consumerist every-mind the new social media, which instill a false promise of personal empowerment, and political freedom, you've got the perfect storm for a right-wing-centrist dynasty.


Anonymous said...

WTF? The party is already centre-right. Frankly, there is little justice and economic development politicking because: many of the new class of member, are in politics for career purpose, and not out of an ideological commitment to serve their constituents. My NDP MLA take 2 seconds to answer praise, and 2 months to respond to requests.

The current NDP Caucaus is about as effective as the wallpaper in the Legislative Assembly. And even less committed.

Anonymous said...

Hi Bill I just can't believe your leaving the radio show,I really enjoy you. I will not be listening to the Good show anymore,as I think most comments R scripted. Plz keep up your great work in the newspaper I never miss it. and the work U have done on BC rail. U will be the winner in the end as your such a great reporter TAKE care THANKS FOR YOUR TIME

Toowoozy said...

I don't want the NDP to move to the centre. I don't want the NDP to move to the left. I want the NDP to move toward creating good, sound policy. This is what's missing. You want voters, you want support, then create good policy and platforms that the public can get behind. You can't win by sitting back looking, waiting, hoping, that the Liberals will screw something up so that you can point out how wrong the government is - it makes you simply look like opportunists rather then future prudent leaders.