Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Premier Christy Clark leads BC Liberals into incredible hurt locker with no key to get out - election this year?

Even the Wealthy Abandoning BC Liberals

Add this to Clark's miseries: NDP pulling more strongly among $100K voters.

Christy Clark in political equivalent of hurt locker in BC politics
Bill Tieleman's 24 hours/The Tyee column

Tuesday April 10, 2012

By Bill Tieleman

"I don't think she's done anything wrong whatsoever."
- Mike Morton, ex-Gordon Campbell press secretary, on Premier Christy Clark, April 7.

If B.C. Premier Christy Clark hasn't done "anything wrong," why has she taken the BC Liberal government into an incredible hurt locker with no key to get out?
And why does veteran pollster Mario Canseco of Angus Reid Public Opinion say Clark's remarkable 37 per cent gender gap with women voters "is certainly one of the biggest I have seen"?
It's actually difficult to underestimate how bad the BC Liberals situation truly is -- and easy to see the political environment getting much worse very soon.
In just the last two weeks we've seen:
Veteran BC Liberal MLA John van Dongen quit over what he called Clark's failed leadership and lack of integrity, joining the BC Conservatives just as two critical by-elections approach April 19;
B.C.'s unemployment rate jump while the national rate dropped -- in the middle of Clark's vaunted and expensively advertised jobs plan;
The province and municipalities being "shocked" by the federal government announcing significant surprise retroactive wage increases for RCMP officers in B.C. -- which could raise costs by millions just after B.C. signed a 20-year contract extension for RCMP policing services;

Clark embarrassed by disclosure from Elections BC that she did not donate one dime to the BC Liberal Party in 2011 despite leading it;
Worst of all, the latest Angus Reid Public Opinion poll showing the BC Liberals and Conservatives tied at 23 per cent, 20 points back of the New Democrats.
The growing bad news makes it increasingly unlikely Clark has the political support needed to govern until the May 14, 2013 fixed election date.
Losing both by-elections in formerly safe BC Liberal seats of Port Moody-Coquitlam and Chilliwack-Hope and trailing the BC Conservatives could encourage more MLA defections like van Dongen's -- and calls for Clark to step down as leader.
Behind in just about everything
Or Clark could attempt an early election this year, to head off a loss of leadership, despite daunting odds of success.

That's because the Angus Reid poll astonishingly shows that the BC Liberals are behind the NDP in every imaginable demographic category and on every significant political issue.

The NDP under leader Adrian Dix leads in every region of B.C. but one -- the Interior.
But the Conservatives lead there at 32 per cent, with the NDP right behind them at 30 per cent and the Liberals just third at 26 per cent.
And election with those kind of numbers would gut the BC Liberals' strongholds and likely see the BC Conservatives and NDP split up the region.
Dix is also regarded by polling respondents as better than either Christy Clark or Conservative leader John Cummins to deal with health care, education, the environment, crime and even the economy -- traditionally the NDP's weak spot.
Clark is ahead of Dix on just one issue -- federal/provincial relations -- no doubt after endless photo ops with Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
But it's hard to see how a successful campaign can be based on getting along well with Ottawa and nothing else.

Clark's problem with women
Perhaps worst of all for the premier -- women intensely dislike Christy Clark.
The gender gap between Clark and Dix among women voters is stunning -- 52 per cent of women polled would vote NDP but just 15 per cent would support Clark's Liberals -- a 37 per cent gulf.
As Mario Canseco of Angus Reid Public Opinion put it in an email interview:
"On the gender gap -- this is certainly one of the biggest I have seen. And I think it shows that it is not a matter -- as some people wrongly assumed -- of having 'a' woman as leader, but of having 'the right' woman." Canseco says.
"I remember a lot of talk about how the gender gap would narrow under Christy Clark, because women, supposedly, were not happy with Gordon Campbell and were happy with [then-NDP leader] Carole James. This is simply not the case," Canseco argues.
  "The main problem I see for the government is a tendency to go for the quick sound bite. Recent events have been carefully choreographed and seem to be designed to remind people that a woman is in charge," he said.

  "This strategy may have been advisable during the first few months, but now it has to be more about how the premier will act in Victoria, rather than about Christy Clark, a woman, serving as premier."


Gender and other factors
Canseco also gives the BC Liberals some free pollster advice on reductionist thinking about gender.

"A lot of people read too much into the fact that Clark defeated three men to get the leadership. It's not as simple as having a woman in charge and suddenly getting that demographic to support you, no questions asked," Canseco warned.
"It's about policies, and on the issues that women care about the most -- such as health care and education -- Adrian Dix has a sizeable lead over Clark. Unless the policies change and the BC Liberals act to reconnect with this demographic, the gap will grow even more," he concluded.

The Angus Reid poll is equally brutal on Clark's "momentum score" -- the difference between the number of people who say their opinion of the premier has improved versus those who say it has worsened.
In the last three months Dix, Cummins and Green Party leader Jane Sterk all have a modest minus two per cent momentum score -- but Clark's score is minus 49 per cent.

Clark also leads the disapproval ratings of the leaders at 59 per cent, with just 32 per cent approving and 10 per cent "not sure," while Dix's performance is approved by 45 per cent and disapproved by 40 per cent, with 15 per cent undecided.
Cummins' disapproval rate of 38 per cent lags behind his 28 per cent approval rate but he also has a 34 per cent "not sure." The nearly invisible Sterk is the least known, with her "not sure" rate at 43 per cent, 31 per cent disapproving and 26 per cent approving of her work.

'Damage to the BC Liberal brand'
Yet another harbinger of political doom can be seen in the ranking of British Columbia's most important issues.

While the economy ranks first at 24 per cent and health care second at 19 per cent, with both declining slightly since January, leadership as an issue has jumped up to 12 per cent from seven per cent, making it the fastest growing issue of concern. That doesn't auger well for Clark given all the other polling numbers.
In our interview, Canseco points to the federal Progressive Conservative party in 1992-93 as having suffered a similar drop in political support which ultimately proved disastrous after Prime Minister Brian Mulroney wore out his welcome with voters and handed the mess over to his successor Kim Campbell.

Canseco notes that Gordon Campbell's imposition of the Harmonized Sales Tax began the BC Liberal Party's spiral downward, leading to his forced resignation.
"I don't think anyone was surprised when our surveys had the BC Liberals at 23 per cent the week the HST came into place," in July 2010, Canseco says.

"What is certainly troubling for the party is that they are back at the same level after Campbell quit, they had their convention, and the new premier came in with a majority in the Legislative Assembly and reasonable popularity," he wrote.
"You usually get a bounce from a change in leadership when the departing leader is unpopular (we saw it in Alberta right after Alison Redford came in to replace Premier Ed Stelmach), but it has worn off substantially both there and here," Canseco says, pointing out the unfolding political disaster in Alberta, where the upstart Wildrose Alliance under Danielle Smith is strongly leading Redford's Conservatives.

"Part of it is damage to the BC Liberal brand. Clark's rating is currently three times higher than what Campbell had in his worst month, but support for the party is as weak as it was in July 2010."
"So the similarities with the PCs continue. People did not dislike Kim Campbell -- she had the highest approval rating for an incumbent prime minister when the 1993 campaign began.

"But she was unable to keep the PC brand alive due to losing support to a well-organized social democratic alternative [federal Liberals under Jean Chrétien], a more right-wing alternative [the Reform Party under Preston Manning] and an exodus from former [Quebec Progressive Conservative] members to form a new party [the Bloc Quebecois under Lucien Bouchard]."
"Clark now has to deal with her own social democratic alternative [Dix, who attracts 14 per cent of 2009 BC Liberal voters] and has a single enemy that is both more right-wing and an attractive venue for former Liberals [the BC Conservatives, who attract 33 per cent of 2009 BC Liberal voters]. This means that 47 per cent of your voters in 2009 are looking elsewhere," Canseco says.

"The [federal] PCs went from 43 per cent in 1988, to 16 per cent in 1993 under Campbell -- that's a 27-point drop. The BC Liberals, right now, are down 23 points [from 46 per cent to 23 per cent]," Canseco concludes.
These are grim numbers indeed by any political party's standard.

But here's another, more graphic way of explaining how bad it is: the BC Liberals aren't even backed by the province's richest voters!
When those making over $100,000 a year are supporting the NDP at 41 per cent versus 28 per cent for Clark's Liberals, after all the party has done for the wealthy over 11 years in power, the penny has definitely dropped in British Columbia.
.

Thursday, April 05, 2012

Bill Tieleman on CBC TV NewsNetwork - Connect with Mark Kelley - on F35 controversy - 5:05 p.m.

Bill Tieleman with Mark Kelley
I will be appearing on Connect with Mark Kelley on CBC TV's NewsNetwork today at about 5:05 p.m. on the F35 fighter jet controversy erupting today.


The online video of this appearance can be found at this link.


UPDATE - Conservative budget cuts have forced CBC to cancel Connect with Mark Kelley!  See my post on this sad development.


.

Dialling for Disaffection Dollars - BC Liberal MLAs and their Party contributions - or lack thereof

BC Liberal MLAs level of disaffection clear from low or no donations to BC LIberal Party in past year
Me? Donate my own money to the BC Liberal Party?
Are you flipping kidding?

BC Premier Christy Clark has made headlines yet again for the wrong reason - because she didn't give the BC Liberal Party she leads one thin dime of a donation in 2011.

Rather an astonishing lack of leadership, especially given the $9.5 million the BC Liberals raised last year.

Clark was quickly taken to the political woodshed and coughed up $550 today but the damage has been done.

Unfortunately, the hapless leader of an unhappy party is far from alone on the Chintz-O-Meter.

In fact, with a few notable exceptions, one could easily argue that the BC Liberal Party donations for 2011 indicated exactly how disaffected each MLA actually is with their current situation.

For MLAs making over $101,000, cabinet ministers making over $150,000 and especially a premier making well over $193,000 plus golden pensions, it looks downright miserly to give nothing and skinflint to give less than $1,000 - or under 1% of basic salary.

On the other hand, how pleased can Rich Coleman, Linda Reid and Ben Stewart be giving more than $4,000 each while their colleagues sit on their fat wallets?

Here are the numbers taken from Elections BC's financial donation records online.


2011 contributions to BC Liberal Party

Christy Clark
0
Kash Heed
0
Joan McIntyre
0
Randy Hawes
$375.00
Don McRae
$375.00
Blair Lekstrom
$400.00
John Les
$405.00
John Slater
$405.00
Gordon Hogg
$430.00
John van Dongen
$430.00
Ron Cantelon
$550.00
Kevin Falcon
$550.00
Bill Barisoff
$625.00
Pat Bell
$650.00
Mike de Jong
$650.00
Terry Lake
$650.00
George Abbott
$665.00
Norm Letnick
$705.00
Douglas Horne
$725.00
Richard Lee
$750.00
Bill Bennett
$810.00
Eric Foster
$810.00
Steve Thomson
$855.00
Rob Howard
$900.00
Colin Hansen
$950.00
Margret MacDiarmid
$950.00
Mary McNeil
$955.00
Jane Thornthwaite
$1,025.00
John Rustad
$1,110.00
Kevin Krueger
$1,125.00
Shirley Bond
$1,145.00
Ida Chong
$1,225.00
Naomi Yamamoto
$1,225.00
Harry Bloy
$1,230.00
Donna Barnett
$1,280.00
Marc Dalton
$1,300.00
Murray Coell
$1,500.00
Mary Polak
$1,580.00
Stephanie Cadieux
$1,705.00
Ralph Sultan
$2,350.00
Pat Pimm
$2,545.00
Moria Stilwell (Including Dr. Moria Stilwell Inc)
$3,020.00
John Yap
$3,090.00
Dave Hayer
$3,435.00
Rich Coleman
$4,150.00
Linda Reid
$4,660.00
Ben Stewart (Including Quail’s Gate)
$6,845.00

Tuesday, April 03, 2012

Fixing Canada's Ugly Politics - the Case for Mandatory Voting - Improve Democracy and Public Engagement

32 countries have mandatory voting - isn't it time
Canada joined them
A Fix for Ugly Politics - Mandatory Voting

Force the vote and halt devious robo-calls, attack ads and apathy.

Bill Tieleman’s 24 hours/The Tyee column

Tuesday April 3, 2012

By Bill Tieleman

"The right to vote is only meaningful when you use it."

- Jean-Pierre Kingsley, former chief electoral officer of Canada

There is a very simple way to quickly put an end to robo-call scandals, dramatically increase voter participation, reduce negative political advertising and strengthen democracy -- without spending any additional money.

The solution: compulsory voting in elections.

How would it work?

On fraudulent robo-calls or live calls that attempt to mislead voters by directing them to the wrong polling location, like the ones being investigated from last year by Elections Canada, there would simply no longer be any point. Since all voters would be required to participate by law, discouraging a very small number would be not only next to impossible but useless.
That's because robo-call mischief only works in close races with low turnout where it makes a difference if a small number of voters can be dissuaded from voting by illegal or at least immoral means.
Compulsory voting kills bad robo-calls dead.
Mandatory voting could also seriously reduce attack ads, since part of their intent is voter suppression -- discouraging supporters of the party or leader being trashed from voting by ruining their reputation.

Since voters must cast ballots, suppression isn't possible. And they may conversely decide to punish the party that sponsors highly negative campaigning while rewarding those that provide constructive reasons to support their policies.

Best of all, making voting the law means the overwhelming majority of eligible voters participate. And because they have to vote, more citizens spend more time examining public issues and the parties' positions on them, boosting democratic engagement.
Canada's democratic disgrace

As a result of compulsory voting, Australia enjoyed a 93 per cent turnout in 2010 and 95 per cent in 2007. And Australia hasn't had a turnout less than 91 per cent since 1925, the first election after compulsory voting was introduced.

Belgium and Luxembourg also use compulsory voting and have participation rates in recent years averaging over 91 per cent.
Canada, by embarrassing comparison, is a democratic disgrace.

Our high point in voter participation was 79.4 per cent in 1958 and hasn't even been in the 70 per cent range since 1993, a span of seven federal elections.
In the federal election last year just 61 per cent voted, with only 59 per cent in 2008.

British Columbia is also democratically disengaged, with a turnout of only 51 per cent in 2009 -- and 58 per cent in 2005.
Big carrot, small stick

Compulsory voting isn't unusual worldwide. Currently 32 countries require eligible citizens to vote in elections, and of those 19 fine or otherwise penalize anyone who does not participate.

Australia's penalty for not voting is quite minor -- a $20 fine. Yet that seems enough to encourage all but a handful of eligible voters to go to the polling stations.
Objections that compulsory voting infringes on civil liberties ring hollow when all Canadian are obligated to pay taxes, serve on juries and obey other laws.

And voters in Australia can spoil their ballot or leave it blank if they do not want to actually vote. Exemptions for religious and other legitimate reasons are respected.
Let's turn around the decline in democracy -- introduce compulsory voting.

.

Friday, March 30, 2012

Thomas Mulcair Is Ready to Rumble! New NDP leader will challenge Stephen Harper in Parliament

His NDP victory promises a battle royale in Parliament and trouble for Liberals, Conservatives, Bloc Quebecois.

Bill Tieleman's 24 hours/The Tyee column

Tuesday March 27, 2012

By Bill Tieleman

(View full Tyee version of article, links and comments.)

"Carry the battle to them. Don't let them bring it to you. Put them on the defensive and don't ever apologize for anything."

- Former U.S. President Harry Truman, 1884-1972.

Thomas Mulcair's election as leader of the New Democratic Party and leader of the official Opposition means two clear things.

First, Parliament will see a battle royale like it has not experienced in many years.

Second, Mulcair is big trouble for the ruling Conservatives, the flagging Liberals and the nearly dead Bloc Quebecois.

NDP members on Saturday decided they were in the biggest fight of their party's existence -- and wanted the toughest, fiercest and most threatening parliamentarian possible as their leader to take on Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

They picked Mulcair, whose nickname was "grizzly bear" when he sat as a provincial Liberal environment minister in the Quebec National Assembly.

And Mulcair's assignment includes not just savaging the Conservative government but also taking out the third place Liberal Party and keeping the Bloc Quebecois a spent separatist force in la belle province.

Because in choosing Mulcair, the NDP is going all in -- aiming to be in position to challenge the Conservatives for power in the 2015 federal election.

Smooth moves

It's a tall order and the fight has already started with the Conservative party issuing talking points to its MPs that trash talk Mulcair, claiming he is an "opportunist" with a "divisive personality."

Mulcair easily brushed this off during interviews immediately after winning the leadership with 57 per cent on the final ballot, laughing on television at Conservatives trying to label him an opportunist when he joined an NDP in 2007 that had no Quebec MPs, no organization and few members.

As for the "divisive" tag, Mulcair didn't need to even address it after leaving a stage where he raised the hand of his main opponent Brian Topp after the victory and shook hands with former leader Ed Broadbent, who had been sharply critical during the campaign.

Mulcair also wisely announced that Vancouver-East MP Libby Davies, a Topp endorser, would return as deputy leader, a post she and Mulcair jointly held under former leader Jack Layton.

Besides, Harper has given the term divisive new meaning in national politics since taking office and antagonizing wide and growing groups of Canadians, something that he will turbocharge with this Thursday's expected slash-and-burn Conservative budget.

Taking up Jack's fight

Thomas Mulcair is not the late, lamented Jack Layton, nor was any of the other contenders.

Jack himself wasn't the Layton of 2011 back in 2003, when he became NDP leader.

But Jack's eight years of leadership and learning created the conditions for Mulcair and the NDP to attempt what the party has always dreamed of -- forming a national government.

It will be an epic battle through 2015.


.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Bill Tieleman gone to Mexico March 26 to April 2; John van Dongen gone to BC Conservatives for rest of political career!

Hola amigos!

I am on a week's holiday in San Jose del Cabo, Mexico, so comments to my blog may be delayed somewhat. Thanks for your patience.

And then I find out BC Liberal MLA John van Dongen quit to join the BC Conservatives on my travel day!

Who is next - and can they please wait till I get back!

Hasta luego!

Bill Tieleman

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Congratulations to Thomas Mulcair on a great win to become the NDP's leader and Canada's Leader of the Opposition!

Thomas Mulcair wins New Democratic Party leadership!

The late Jack Layton, Bill Tieleman and Thomas Mulcair,
outside Hotel Vancouver, September 28, 2007
Congratulations to Thomas Mulcair, the new leader of the NDP and Canada's new Leader of the Official Opposition!

Tom is a worthy successor to our friend Jack Layton.  Tom's Parliamentary skill, experience in government and opposition and fierce determination will put Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper on the defensive - and acting Liberal leader Bob Rae on the sidelines.

It has been a long, gruelling campaign and every one of the NDP's candidates for leader has done an admirable job building the party as they toured across the country giving their own vision for Canada's future.

Now is the time for the NDP to unite behind Thomas Mulcair and provide an alternative government for Canadians to consider, a constructive alternative to the confrontational, divisive and regressive Conservative administration.

Good luck - bon chance - Tom and thanks - merci - to Brian Topp, Nathan Cullen, Peggy Nash, Paul Dewar, Niki Ashton and Martin Singh for all your efforts.

.

NDP leadership ballots show two different approaches to future of party

UPDATED - THIRD BALLOT


It looks very clear that Thomas Mulcair will take the NDP leadership in the upcoming fourth ballot after posting 43.8% support on the third round, versus 31.6% for Brian Topp and 24.6% for Nathan Cullen, who is now forced off the final vote.

Topp needs to take three-quarters of Cullen's former support to win, while Mulcair requires just one-quarter to succeed.  It is certainly do-able but really hard to see it happening.

Cullen ran an impressively strong and surprising campaign and can be proud of his efforts.  Initially seen as likely to be an also-ran without even a large base of regional support in BC, Cullen showed himself to be a potential future leader and a force to be reckoned with in the House of Commons in the days ahead.

One wonders if Cullen's controversial "electoral cooperation" plan that gained him much attention ultimately helped or hurt his campaign but without question NDP members responded to his personality and fresh approach in a major way.

Regardless, the NDP has to be breathing a big sigh of relief that the animosity some feared might break out on the convention floor between campaigns has not materialized.

Less happily, the apparent hacker attack on the online voting system has seriously slowed down the process by hours and possibly discouraged many eligible voters from participating, reducing turnout.  One can only hope that what happened is clarified and if it is indeed an attack, the culprits be found.

Guest NDP badge from 1961 founding convention - still called
the "New Party" then before name of New Democratic Party decided
UPDATE - SECOND BALLOT

A very tough first and second ballot result for Peggy Nash, as well as for Paul Dewar, Niki Ashton and Martin Singh.

Peggy worked so hard on this very long campaign and showed great grace in accepting the results of the third ballot.  I am disappointed in the result but not in her impressive efforts.

Paul, Niki and Martin all made significant contributions and have a bright future ahead.

Nathan Cullen, Brian Topp and Thomas Mulcair - well done - each of you has run strong campaigns and deserve to see that recognized by NDP members, as has happened.

Good luck to all!


ORIGINAL POST AFTER FIRST BALLOT


Second and third ballots will determine which route lies ahead for future of New Democratic Party


Fascinating results from the NDP leadership first ballot show the two competing approaches for the future of the party:

1) Move to the centre to better compete with the Conservatives and win in 2015 while further marginalizing the Liberals or:

2) Focus on social democratic principles and build support for a more left of centre alternative.

Thomas Mulcair, Nathan Cullen and Martin Singh fall into the first approach.

Peggy Nash, Brian Topp and perhaps Paul Dewar and Niki Ashton take the second view.

And that, given the first ballot vote, appears to me to be the significant philosophical battle underway today - both in the leadership campaign and in the party itself.

But none of this should be overemphasized.  The most centrist NDP imaginable is still way to the left of the most liberal Liberal Party, even under ex-NDPer Bob Rae.

The second ballot will show whether Mulcair will be the eventual winner or can be defeated by the combined second and third choice ballots of candidates dropping out.

Mulcair needs to get most of Singh's votes -  as Singh urged well before the convention began - and pick up enough from Dewar and Ashton to get close to 40% and appear the unstoppable force.

My candidate, Peggy Nash, had an unquestionably disappointing result but is staying in and now needs to get ahead of Nathan Cullen based on the second choices of Dewar, Ashton and Singh, plus any live votes moving around.

Her route to victory is now more difficult but not impossible.  I predicted a final Mulcair vs Nash vote and that's still potentially in the cards.

Cullen has to stay in the race and get closer to Topp to position himself as able to challenge Mulcair in the final ballot.

Topp has to gain some second ballot support and solidify his position as the only alternative to Mulcair, then pick up a fair number of votes from whoever is forced off the ballot.

Lastly, all NDP supporters have to be disappointed with the low turnout in this first ballot, which is unlikely to increase in subsequent votes.

With just over 65,000 first ballot votes cast of just over 130,000 members, the NDP has only achieved a 50% turnout - ironically just about the same turnout as in the last federal election.

Apparently online voting is not having the desired effect of increasing participation.

For those of us political junkies who grew up on the drama of delegated conventions with their dramatic candidates moving across the floor to rivals and the abundance of straw hats and other bumpf, perhaps one-member, one-vote isn't the future of politics after all!

Here are the first ballot results:


Thomas Mulcair: 19,728 votes (30.3 per cent)
Brian Topp: 13,915 votes (21.4 per cent)
Nathan Cullen: 10,671 votes (16.4 per cent)
Peggy Nash: 8,353 votes (12.8 per cent)
Paul Dewar: 4,883 votes (7.5 per cent)
Martin Singh: 3,821 votes (5.9 per cent)
Niki Ashton: 3,737 votes (5.7 per cent)

.