Monday, April 14, 2014

BC Liberals Protect Agricultural Farmland? Horse Manure!

Osoyoos, BC - where significant farmland is preserved
You can bet the farm they'll sell out the Agricultural Land Reserve... again.

Bill Tieleman’s 24 Hours Vancouver / The Tyee column
Tuesday April 8, 2014
By Bill Tieleman
"It functioned up until the election of this Liberal administration... politics has interfered and land is being removed and that is a serious, serious mistake." -- Former NDP premier Dave Barrett, Voice Of BC, June 29, 2005
Don't believe the BC Liberal government will "protect farmland" or "help farmers" -- its Bill 24 is all about continuing its attack the Agricultural Land Reserve, which began shortly after the party's 2001 election win.
Former NDP premier Dave Barrett wasn't fooled back in 2005, and no one should be fooled today by the nonsensical bafflegab spun by cabinet minister Bill Bennett, who introduced legislation to carve up farmland for use by industry and developers while undermining the Agricultural Land Commission's independence from political interference.
Bill 24 would split B.C. into two zones with very different rules on removing farmland protected by the ALR. The bill enables government to use "economic, cultural and social values" and "regional and community planning objectives" or "other prescribed conditions" decided by cabinet to plough ahead with farmland removal.
Bennett is unlikely to stop at one radical change to the ALR, which currently applies to Zone 2 of B.C. -- the Interior, the North and the Kootenays.
Just wait for the other shoe to drop in Zone 1, including the South Coast, Okanagan and Vancouver Island, where B.C.'s most productive land that creates 85 per cent of farm receipts is under enormous pressure from developers and industry.
Ministers of manure
Bennett is the minister responsible for a "core review" of government and is clearly driving his anti-ALR agenda, first made clear eight years ago.
There has always been a defined process for removing farmland from the ALR, which protects five per cent of B.C. Thousands of hectares have been exempted since it was introduced in 1974, mostly from areas with the most productive soil.
Before the ALR's creation, B.C. lost about 6,000 hectares of farmland each year. But it's not like the ALR stopped the loss of all farmland, particularly in southern B.C.
Between 1974 and 2013, Metro Vancouver lost 5,910 hectares of farmland and the Fraser Valley 5,083 hectares, according to ALC reports, while overall land protected has shrunk by 94,795 hectares since 1974.
But Bennett doesn't care, preferring to claim that the ALR is some bureaucratic nightmare that preserves useless land simply to penalize its impoverished owners. "There is some land within the Agricultural Land Reserve that actually is useless to agriculture," Bennett said.
"That land could be located in a region where there's six months of winter. In some cases the land is covered by forest. I've seen land within the reserve that's mountainous. It's steep. It's rocky. It's swampy. It has really poor-quality soil and no feasible access to water."
Oh the horror! Poverty-stricken farmers forced to plant crops on rocks and swampland because of evil rules written in Victoria to keep them in serfdom!
What horse manure from Bennett, who last year described the opposition as "turds" on Twitter!
If Bennett isn't bad enough, last year Agriculture Minister Pat Pimm was admonished by the Agricultural Land Commission for attempting to "politically influence" an attempt to removed protected farmland from the ALR to build a rodeo and recreational vehicle campsite.
And despite the commission rejecting the application, Arizona developer Terry McLeod built a race track, parking lot and seating for 3,000 people anyway, apparently completely confident the BC Liberal government would do nothing to stop him. Obviously, he was correct.
Bennett and Pimm's legislation could soon pass, so support the protection of B.C. farmland by letting your MLA know and signing a petition online here.



scotty on denman said...

Bill Bennet in charge of "core review"=Larry Flynt in charge of moral rectitude. He's as open about it, too.

This has been going on in quieter ways. When farm gate sales of farmer-raised livestock and small abattoirs were eliminated or sharply curtailed on Vancouver Island, it introduced a new criterion into the definition of farm land, that of economic feasibility rather than soil productivity, as was the ALR's original purpose---meaning there's a definite acreage minimum for "making a living", somehow redefined itself. Not to say that every small farm lot, or "hobby farm" or intensive, permaculture organic farm ever realized a living wage but as part of a landowner's living, or simply a lifestyle, it lowered land tax assessment substantially and, purposefully, maintained the soil's productive potential. It seemed an equitable way to preserve farmable soil, even as yet forested. Making it impossible for small farmers to realize a living breaks that deal and adds pressure to convert to another type of land use. On SE Van Isle, that's residential and commercial real estate. It's easy to guess which side of the fence votes which way: all you need to know is who real estate developers are likely to vote for. The farmable-soil criterion is getting ploughed under a bunch of economic feasibility criteria and the pea is hopelessly lost among the shells.

e.a.f. said...

there are all sorts of owners of acreages all over the lower mainland waiting for Bennett to get rid of the ALR. They have been purchasing the land to build very large homes, however, the taxes can be a tad on the high side. They can sell a lot of the land to developers and continue with their life style with 10K square foot homes. Where they think they'll get their food is another thing.