Troy Lanigan |
Jordan Bateman |
Not-for-profit CTF scolds government for dubious spending, but keeps its own books tightly shut.
Bill Tieleman’s 24 Hours Vancouver /
The Tyee column
Tuesday September 17, 2013
By Bill Tieleman
"We've
definitely lost donors who would like to see more transparency."
- Canadian Taxpayers Federation CEO Troy Lanigan
You
can't turn on your television or radio or read a newspaper regularly without
discovering some nefarious spending by government uncovered by the Canadian
Taxpayers Federation.
Its
B.C. director, Jordan Bateman, is a regular fixture in the media, denouncing
taxes and public sector spending.
But who
watches the watchdog, making sure the organization dedicated to "lower taxes, less waste and accountable government"
is equally accountable to the public it seeks to influence?
Apparently,
almost no one.
While
the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, or CTF, boasts that it speaks for 84,000
supporters, it has just five -- count 'em, five -- actual members who decide
its policies.
And the
CTF does not hold an open annual general meeting, policy conferences, or any
other membership gatherings that one might expect from a group that's
constantly in the news demanding transparency from others.
Those
five members form a board of directors who determine its budget, strategic plan
and communications.
Donor
names are secret, staff salaries are not posted by name, and while the CTF
strongly denies being corporately funded and insists that 94 per cent of their
donations are less than $1,000, there is no way to determine if that's true.
CEO
Troy Lanigan defends CTF's structure however, saying in an interview that
"very, very seldom" do they get requests for open meetings from
supporters, who last year gave the federal not-for-profit
corporation almost $4 million.
"It's
ultimately accountable to funders. Donations are voluntary. People choose to be
on our list; they drop off all the time," Lanigan said Friday from
Victoria.
'We
have a philosophical bent'
It's
clear the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is also fundamentally right-wing in its
politics.
Federal
Conservative Immigration Minister Jason Kenney is a former CTF CEO. New Brunswick Conservative MP John
Williamson, an ex-communications director for Prime Minister Stephen
Harper, was federal CTF director. And Sara MacIntyre went from B.C. CTF
director to become Harper's press secretary and then BC Liberal Premier Christy
Clark's communications director
for a time.
B.C.'s
Bateman is a former president of BC
Liberal cabinet minister Rich Coleman's Langley constituency association.
The current five directors who are the CTF's only members
include John Mortimer, president of LabourWatch -- a group
that promotes union decertification -- and a past Canadian Alliance candidate.
Erin
Chutter [formerly Airton], a mining executive who has worked for the
federal Conservatives and BC Liberals, and an ex-24 Hours Vancouver columnist,
was a director until April 2013.
There
don't appear to be any current or former staff or directors remotely connected
to the New Democrats or unions.
Lanigan
said it's no secret the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is right-wing.
"We
have a philosophical bent. I don't like being called a small-c conservative --
I prefer libertarian," Lanigan said.
"We
obviously agree with the Conservatives on some issues, but not all," he
added, pointing to a current campaign roasting now ex-Conservative Senator Mike
Duffy over his expenses.
He
insisted that CTF staff drop political party memberships and donations when
they join, but admitted: "I cringe when our people go run in politics
[afterwards]. But if people look at it objectively, we also go after
conservative politicians."
Do
lefty 'counterparts' disclose?
Lanigan
pointed out the CTF has also supported many New Democrat initiatives to improve
government accountability, such as B.C.'s pioneering Freedom Of Information
laws in the 1990s, pension and tax reforms made by the Saskatchewan NDP, and
federal NDP leader Tom Mulcair's private member's bill to make the
Parliamentary Budget Officer fully independent.
Lanigan
also said the organization had a better relationship with former Liberal
finance minister Paul Martin than with current Conservative Finance Minister
Jim Flaherty.
But
even a cursory look at the CTF website shows most of its campaigns target
taxes, government spending, debt and public sector union wages and benefits --
all with a conservative/libertarian approach.
"A
lot of our debates are with unions in the public sector. They are effective on
issues and we clash with them," Lanigan said.
Lanigan
pointed to the Council of Canadians and the Canadian Centre for Policy
Alternatives (CCPA) as counterparts on the political left that are doing the
same kind of advocacy work.
But the
Council of Canadians promotes individual memberships and
has an annual general membership meeting in October, plus dozens of local chapters that meet
regularly. It reports raising $4.5 million last year, but rejects either
corporate or government funding while accepting union contributions.
The
CCPA also encourages people to join as members and has charitable tax status which requires different reporting
under federal rules. It raised just over $5 million last year, with individuals
the single largest source of donations, said CCPA's B.C. director Seth Klein,
while also accepting union contributions.
Klein
disputed Lanigan's terming the CCPA a "counterpart" of the CTF.
"We're
first and foremost a research institute, not a campaign and lobby
organization," Klein said Monday, noting that any research funded by
donors is disclosed.
Selective
opposition to taxes
Back at
the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, even its opposition to taxes is selective.
The CTF
astonishingly refused to oppose the Harmonized Sales Tax
imposed by then-premier Gordon Campbell's BC Liberal government, despite
widespread popular opposition.
Then-CTF
B.C. director Maureen Bader dismissed efforts by Fight HST -- which I helped create -- to stop the
tax.
"The
HST is not going away. It doesn't matter how many petitions there are, or how
outraged people are -- and they are really outraged about it -- the government
is not going to back down," Bader said in 2010.
In
2009, Bader actually praised the HST: "In theory, it's a good thing. In
the short term it's bad for families, but over the long run it should help with
economic growth and increase incentives to work and invest in the province."
Fortunately
the CTF didn't discourage over 700,000 voters from signing the Citizens
Initiative petition that forced the vote that killed the HST.
Lanigan
admitted his organization's position on the tax split members in B.C.
But
when the Nova Scotia NDP government announced an HST increase, the CTF opposed
it and cited the hike as one of its main reasons
for opening an Atlantic office in Halifax.
Watch
the watchdog
It all
makes one wonder how the Canadian Taxpayers Federation can roast politicians in
public for lack of transparency with a straight face while keeping its own
decision-making and accountability very private.
"We're
not spending taxpayer dollars, and donors have a choice to give us money or
not," Lanigan said.
And
asked who is the watchdog on the CTF itself, Lanigan replied: "People like
yourself, the media, some governments who fire back."
A close look
at the organization's structure certainly indicates it's worth watching.
.
9 comments:
Nice post! BTW, the CTF has 6 members, not 5. Have a look at David Climenhaga's blog. He clarified the membership numbers near the bottom. (Disclosure: I did the research on this piece.)
http://albertadiary.ca/2013/03/minuscule-canadian-taxpayers-federation-in-running-for-turfy-award.html
Since the point of your article was to criticize the CTA about disclosure, I am disappointed that you did not include a link to any financial disclosure reports from the CCPA. The two links that you did post to their site had nothing to do with that.
You also quote them as saying that the CPPA are a research group, not a lobby group, yet their home page says that they are "concerned with issues of social, economic and environmental justice." and also " the CCPA is one of Canada’s leading progressive voices in public policy debates".
I suspect that they say they are not a lobby group because if they admitted it, it might threaten their status as a charity, although I am not an expert on charitable tax status.
As a counter to your point that no NDs are on the CTS board, I will point out that none of the CCPA staff in BC have any background in business. See:
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/offices/bc/about/staff
At a similar link, the BC CCPA board of directors simply lists 15 names in alphabetical order. I started going through that list and googling them:
Lynn Bueckert - pops up as Director of Research and Campaigns, BCGEU
Michael Byers - UBC Global Politics Prof.
Jim Chorostecki - Executive Director, BC Federation of Labour
Marcy Cohen - Her Linkedin profile lists her as "past reserach [sic] and policy director Hospital Employees' Union"
Need I go on?
Libertarians are Conservatives too gutless to admit being Neo-Cons. Too afraid to show who their donors are.
Mr. Tieleman may be a fine journalist but a great journalist wouldn't be doubting Lanigan's claim that the vast amount of donations are personal and well under the $1,000 mark.Anyone working in the field raising funds can attest to that.
They are much like their cousins at the Fraser Institute.
This approach is typical of many special interest lobby groups. In terms of the financial influence of a few large backers (versus genuinely wide-spread support), the size of each donation received is less relevant than the total cumulative amount of donations from each particular donor each year,and a donors' proportionate share of all donations in the end. Because one influential donor may give dozens of donations (or more) of less than $1000 each, but they add up to a lot more at the end of the year. That's a more true measure of the range of influence/support from particular donors.
Bill, shall we now talk about lack of transparency and democracy in some trade unions? No. I didn't think so.
Actually Anon Oct 1 - why don't we do just that? Bring it on.
During week two of the maintenance diet you will start to add some "caution foods".
s book, one of his claims is that the diencephalon will
function properly in the burning of fat after the protocol is complete because of the HCG [5].
Just because you really feel you have to lose weight fast and easily doesn't mean you should bypass your physician and click the "Buy" button without
really being aware what you're getting into.
My blog post melbourne personal training
Post a Comment