Monday, May 25, 2015

Bad Optics for BC NDP $2,000 Candidate Entry Fee in Vancouver Mount Pleasant

Vancouver Mount Pleasant MLA Jenny Kwan launching her federal NDP nomination campaign - Bill Tieleman photo
Party brass unanimously approved charge to run in one of province's poorest ridings.

Bill Tieleman’s 24 Hours Vancouver / The Tyee column

Tuesday May 5, 2015

By Bill Tieleman

“The New Democratic Party holds firm to the belief that the dignity, freedom and equality of the individual is a basic right that must be maintained and extended."


Here's the big money question: is the B.C. New Democratic Party deliberately trying to create internal dissent with a new $2,000 non-refundable "entry fee" in the upcoming Vancouver-Mount Pleasant by-election?

Or is it simply oblivious to the optics of a party that wants to be seen as sticking up for the little guy demanding candidate fees that are higher than any other party is charging?

Even worse, the BC NDP executive unanimously approved the new $2,000 fee for one of B.C.'s poorest ridings.

The party says it's all about fundraising and being competitive with its better-financed BC Liberal Party opponents.

BC NDP president Craig Keating defends the move, saying on Monday that candidate fees were in place in the 2013 election, though he was unable to say how much they were.

"Fees help us recover the costs of the nomination," Keating said, adding that the new entry charge only applies to by-elections so far.

However, as The Tyee's Andrew MacLeod has reported, the move has rankled many rank and file members as a major financial impediment to candidates who don't have quick access to $2,000.

It's just plain wrong. A social democratic party fighting economic inequality and helping the under-privileged has no business demanding a $2,000 entry fee from a candidate just for the right to put their name forward for members to democratically decide on their candidacy.

Why should a worthy candidate of limited means be dependent on the charity of others to raise the money?
It smacks of elitism and entitlement, at a time when voters in Alberta appear ready to dismiss their Conservative government in today's election for exactly those reasons.

The BC NDP opened nominations on April 22 and closed them May 1, giving any candidate only a week to come up with the $2,000.

Great candidate, overshadowed by controversy

The controversy is too bad, because the BC NDP has attracted an excellent candidate to vie for the seat of veteran MLA Jenny Kwan, who will step down from her position to run in the federal election.

Melanie Mark is a former deputy to the Representative for Children and Youth, Mary-Ellen Turpel Lafond, whose office is respected for fighting to protect children in care and demanding accountability from government.

If she won the by-election, Mark would become the only First Nations MLA in the B.C. Legislature. Her accomplishments and abilities are considerable.

Unfortunately, the fee controversy -- if not quickly fixed -- may be an unwelcome distraction for the BC NDP from attacking the BC Liberals' atrocious record on child poverty and other issues.

Mark herself has raised concerns about the fee.

"I'm sure it's a barrier. We need to reduce barriers for people, and I want this to be a fair, equitable, transparent process," she said last week.

Ironically, the federal NDP has no entry fee for candidates; the federal Conservatives have a refundable $1,000 "Good Conduct Bond" that is returned if candidates respect the rules; and the federal Liberal Party charges a $1,000 fee.

The BC Liberal Party did not respond to email and phone inquiries by deadline, but a veteran party activist said they were unaware of any candidate nomination fee.

Fundraising the fee

For perspective, here's what it takes for some less-than-well-off British Columbians to raise personally come up with the BC NDP's $2,000 entry fee.

At an average B.C. wage of $25.73, it would take over 77 hours of work to raise the fee.

For a person on disability benefits of about $906 a month, it would take over two months.

And it would mean over 195 hours working at B.C.'s current minimum wage of $10.25 an hour.

The $2,000 fee may not seem like much to some, but it is a substantial barrier to many.
The BC NDP has made an unnecessary problem for itself. The smart move is to end this policy and the controversy it's creating immediately.


3 comments:

PeterInEdmonton said...

Thanks for noticing some politics external to BC and congratulations to you on your fellow travelers' victory in Alberta. You must be pretty busy to have taken so long to getting around to copying in this post, although it makes sense in the context of the original article.
Another problem with a high fee is that it might prevent the NDP from fielding a full slate of candidates, particularly in ridings with a long track record of a low NDP vote. Why would somebody run to uphold the NDP flag in a riding where they have a low chance of even getting their deposit back, let alone the $2000.00, which will probably not even get spent in the "low-hope" ridings? It raises the spectre of unseemly under-the-table payments to candidates to put their name forward.
I will spare the mainly BC readers of this blog a lot of detail on the Alberta election. When I tried to engage many of my friends here on the NDP's actual platform, most had not read it and did not want to read it; they were so mad at the PCs. Bill's analogy to our election is apt. Since you seem busy, I won't dwell on the Manitoba Government's similar arrogance on sales tax. The Alberta NDP included a no-tales-tax promise in their platform as did all elected parties, so no issue here...yet.
Perhaps the party is trying to avoid a situation similar to Alberta's Deborah Drever without having to go through the bother of vetting candidates on immature recent social media postings. If you are not familiar with that, it is worth Googling.

Len Peters said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Len Peters said...

Bill, I didn't see you comment on how the BC NDP had a $50,000 "deposit" for its leadership. That was a real back room deal if there ever was one.

But you've always known what side your bread is buttered; Horigan is as close to your former employer Dix as is possible.