The BC Liberals made a big error
choosing Christy Clark as their leader – voters shouldn’t make the same mistake
BC Premier Christy Clark - trust me! |
Tuesday May
7, 2013
By Bill Tieleman
"We've
got tankers going up and down the St. Lawrence for heaven's sake. I don't know
why we'd ban them necessarily off the west coast."
-
Christy Clark, Feb. 24, 2011.
If
you liked how the BC Liberals betrayed voters by imposing the Harmonized Sales
Tax (HST) after the 2009 provincial election, you'll love what they will
probably do with bitumen oil pipelines if they win again in 2013!
Premier
Christy Clark's position on the Enbridge Northern Gateway and Kinder Morgan
pipeline proposals from Alberta is short and anything but clear: "Trust
me!"
This
from a leader whose party told voters it had "no plans" to bring in
the HST -- and then did exactly that mere weeks after the election.
The
BC Liberals said in writing to homebuilder and restaurant owner groups who were
worried -- and asked about an HST -- not to worry.
Then
after the 2009 election, their financial throats were slit when the HST was
brought in!
So
in this election, why would voters be suckers once again and reward Christy
Clark's party for breaking trust?
And
Clark herself had a clear choice when she became premier: she could have
scrapped the HST and saved British Columbia an enormous amount of time, trouble
and money.
Instead
Clark led the government's expensive pro-HST campaign against the grassroots
group Fight HST, which I helped form with ex-Social Credit premier Bill Vander
Zalm, that forced Canada's first ever citizens Initiative vote on the tax.
Bill Tieleman and former BC Premier Bill Vander Zalm during Fight HST campaign |
Even
after 705,000 people signed the Initiative petition, Clark spent $6 million
taxpayer dollars on HST advertising.
And
Clark removed financial disclosure regulations in the binding referendum, so we
will never know how many additional millions the big business coalition spent.
Whether
you were against or for the HST, it was clearly a political betrayal of trust.
And
now in this election whether you are against or for the Enbridge and Kinder
Morgan pipeline projects, can you trust the BC Liberals?
Clark
plays both sides
Why
won't Clark commit to being either against the pipelines, like New Democrat
Leader Adrian Dix and Green Party Leader Jane Sterk, or in favour, like BC
Conservative Leader John Cummins?
Then
look at her comments on the record -- on both sides of the issue.
Clark
said during the BC Liberal leadership campaign that oil tankers travelling our
ecologically sensitive coastline were no problem:
"We've
got tankers going up and down the St. Lawrence for heaven's sake. I don't know
why we'd ban them necessarily off the West Coast. I think that's a step too
far, way too soon," Clark said in February 2011.
"Let's not foreclose our options here before we even decide whether or not
the Enbridge pipeline is going to be built."
But
later Clark said she had five conditions
that must be met before B.C. would agree to the Enbridge pipeline, including
that the province get "a fair share of the fiscal and economic
benefits".
And
that proponents provide: "World-leading marine oil spill response,
prevention and recovery systems for B.C.'s coastline and ocean to manage and
mitigate the risks and costs of heavy oil pipelines and shipments...."
Who
would interpret whether all the conditions were met on oil pipelines after the
election? Christy Clark -- trust me!
Voting
NDP carries power to stop pipelines
For
anti-pipeline voters this election offers a critical choice -- because only one
opposition party can form a government -- the New Democrats, not the Green
Party.
And
both the Enbridge and Kinder Morgan pipeline decisions will be made in the next
four years by whoever is elected May 14.
That
means those considering voting Green have a tough choice.
That's
especially true in closely fought ridings like Vancouver-Point Grey -- where
Clark faces NDP candidate David Eby, who nearly defeated her in the 2011
by-election and could do so this time.
Voting
for your beliefs is important but so is considering the consequences for the
province if the BC Liberals are narrowly re-elected and have the power to
approve both Enbridge and Kinder Morgan.
That
makes this election environmentally time sensitive.
But
whether it's oil pipelines, B.C's $11 billion debt increase in just two years,
job losses or claims this year's budget is "balanced," it's
abundantly clear the BC Liberals made a big mistake when they chose Christy
Clark as their new leader.
Voters should
not make the same mistake on May 14.
.
16 comments:
IF you want to continue with a government that is arrogant, deceitful, incompetent and corrupt, be sure to vote Liberal on May 14.
.. and if you want a government that panders to Labour be sure to vote NDP on May 14.
regardless of your choice...
... on May 14, get out and vote.
Move your can.
I can identify with what you are saying Bill as I am in the riding of Oak Bay Gordon head. I like many of the voters here want to give Elizabeth May a colleague to team up with in parliament but not at the sacrifice of having Liberal leader Ida Chong come up through the middle. Perhaps you could expand on this further how much in danger is the NDP vote since we have a strong showing of the greens here with Andrew Weaver. thanks, Rachel McDonnell
Rachel, the idea that MS.May will get a seat is about as likely as you and I going to the moon next week. She has said that if not elected she will resin, so not too much commitment on her part and a strange thing for a candidate to say with less than a week to go.
DPL:
You wrote "She will resin"?
She'll coat her self in liquid resin plastic?
Kinda goes against being green doesn't it?
"To the Moon, Alice!!"
DPL said:
She has said that if not elected she will resin,..."
So Elizabeth May according to DPL will ooze resin if she doesn't win?
Ewwwww....
Does DPL resin too?
Ewwww..
I believe if this had been part of the NDP advertising campaign it would all be over except for the crying. But no ... got to play nice. When is the NDP going to get it that you can't play nice with the devil. If you come close to losing blame the back room boys for a lacklustre performance and if that's any indication of govt. to come.. well it'll be over in 4 without a doubt.
NotAnon says.Sorry folks I got the provincial Green leader mixed up with the federal one. I'm a lousy one finger typist but sure as heck know how to fill in a ballot, unlike our present premier
Can you write a memo and date it right unlike our Premier to be?
Remember your ABC'S
ADRIAN BEFORE CLARK
For the NDP's position, go here.
http://www.bcndp.ca/sustainablebc
The whole Ms. Clark advance poll fiasco was wrong in that the DRO did not do his/her duty as set out in the Election Act. When Clark put her name on the ballot, that ballot should have been immediately declared a spoiled ballot, and a new ballot issued to the voter.
Correct
but remember it's not her name that spoiled the ballot, it was two names.
The other thing, the counterfoil strip was torn off, and Christy had the stupidity of showing the Poll Clerk an open faced ballot.
Anonymous (ex: Poll Clerk)
I have to correct John (DRO). In provincial lingo it is a VO or VC firstly.
Spoiling a ballot can only be done by the voter. VO/VC teams cannot do that because they CANNOT see who the voter voted for. That would be a violation. Only the voter can make that decision.
VO/VC teams can only reject a ballot during initial count or final if a blank ballot.
Christy is an idiot for exposing her ballot, but it was her choice, not the voting team. (She voted absentee).
Ms.Photo Op is not the sharpest knife in the block, or to put it another way.Dumb as a bag of hammers.
Ha Ha Ha...
she done gone soiled her own ballet
-jethro
Post a Comment