Thursday, December 06, 2007

Will Basi-Virk secret witness hearing involving police informer delay or derail whole trial? Veteran lawyer wonders


The trial of three provincial government aides charged in the BC Legislature Raid case could be further delayed - or even never happen - thanks to a lengthy and legally complex pre-trial hearing today in BC Supreme Court, says a prominent media lawyer.

Veteran lawyer Roger McConchie, representing CTV, the Globe and Mail and the Canadian Press, told reporters outside court that legal wrangling over the right of the Crown to have a judge hear from a police informant in secret - without defence counsel, the media or public in attendance could delay the March 2008 trial date - or even put it off forever.

McConchie described the legal proceedings as like a Russian Matryoshka nesting doll, where each doll conceals another inside.

At stake - a Special Prosecutor application to Justice Elizabeth Bennett for a Section 37 certificate under the Canada Evidence Act that would grant "informer privilege" for a witness and exclude even defence lawyers from the courtroom.

"If the certificate is sustained, counsel for the accused can apply to the Appeal Court. My guess would be if that happens, the March trial date would be delayed," McConchie said.

"If the certificate fails then we're back to this morning's decision and counsel for the defence get to stay. If not, counsel for the accused can file an appeal and if that happens, it's anyone's guess if this is ever going to go to trial," said.

Then McConchie described the whole situation as like a Matryoshka.

"It is a truly nested doll hearing - I've never seen one before. How far down is this series of nested doll in-camera hearings going to go?" McConchie asked.
A sign at BC Supreme Court Room 54 says it all for this afternoon:
"This Courtroom Is Closed To The Public."

After a lunchtime adjournment Bennett heard arguments against the secret witness application from defence counsel for David Basi, Bob Virk, who face breach of trust and fraud charges, and Aneal Basi, who faces money laundering charges.

All charges stem from allegations by police that Dave Basi and Bob Virk passed on confidential government documents regarding the $1 billion privatization of BC Rail to one of the bidders through lobbyist Erik Bornmann, now the Crown's key witness. Aneal Basi is alleged to have passed on money from Bornmann to Dave Basi.

Unfortunately, I cannot tell you what the defence argued in court because Justice Bennett banned the media, the public and media lawyers shortly after the hearing resumed.

And defence lawyers leaving the closed courtroom for an afternoon break declined all comment, citing the judge's ruling that the hearing proceed in secret.

Bennett did relax the temporary publication ban on proceedings that had been imposed earlier.

That ban had prevented me and other journalists from temporarily even reporting that the secret hearing was about hiding the identity of a police informant, even though we had previously reported it without restriction.

Earlier Bennett cited a long list of legal cases before ruling that defence lawyers could remain in the court room to hear the Crown's application.

"I do not conclude that Named Person applies to the exclusion of defence counsel," Bennett said. "I rule defence may be present, given certain undertakings." Those undertakings, she said, would protect the identity of the informer from being disclosed.

But that ruling caused Special Prosecutor Janet Winteringham to ask for the Section 37 application, which would again see the defence counsel excluded. [Lead Special Prosecutor Bill Berardino was absent today.]

And Winteringham felt Bennett's temper when she first told the Justice that the Crown would delay filing the application.

Winteringham: "I'd like to file it Monday."

Bennett: "That's one sentence - I don't understand. I want it today. When can you have it?"

Winteringham: "Yes. By 11:30 a.m."
The secret hearing - and the ban on media and the public - continues on Friday.

It is unclear if or when defence counsel might be excluded too, if Justice Bennett so orders.


Sam i am said...

Bill the editorializing aside by the media lawyer it appears that the defence has won again. And the Special Prosecutor is trying "Plan B" to deny the public the information?

At the end of the day, who wins if this case get's tied up in legal wrangling?


You may still owe me that glass of Cab Sav.
The legal fighters on both sides of this 48 month rigged-match will likely take their "dives" within micro-seconds of each other.
Mistrial, thrown out on appeal or Charter challenge . . . "No connected Grits will do ever time in BC". Just like Air India's outcome . . . it's Don King's rules

Gazetteer said...

Just as long as it's not Don King's hair......


St. nick said...

will informant protection rule the day? what can the special prosecution team do if the judge again rules against them?

tune in to bill tieleman for all the answers....we hope.

Bill Tieleman said...

I want to warn posters that comments which may be defamatory will not be published here.

G West said...

I take it that no one from Canwest Global presented arguments (through their lawyer) on the value of having the press in the court reporting on this important case?

Don't you find THAT a trifle troubling given the fact that the major dailies in the province are all Canwest organs?

Is this just a slipup or do you think they didn't send their lawyer because they don't think this case is "newsworthy"?

BC Mary said...

... or, G West:

CanWest didn't send lawyers (or even journalists) because they find it so extremely icky to be faced with having to publish this kind of newz.

Better to pretend that "The show is over, folks, nuthin' to see here ... just keep movin' along, thank you folks, move along now."

I'd truly like to see some kind of inquiry examining the BC media which can tell us every horrid detail of a Coquitlam pig farm, and boom-all about how we lost the nation's 3rd largest railway.

BC has a media where one of its best-known journalists can suffer a break-in and it's never mentioned? All Bill's colleagues are in lock-down or something?

Isn't there legislation about accuracy in advertising? Which would require CanWest to stop calling itself a NEWZpaper and start to call itself kitty litter @ $1. per 500 g.?

Aw shoot ... my apologies for crankiness, but this is what I mean: another day of tensely waiting hour by hour to find out what, if anything, happened in the Courtroom of Madam Justice Bennett today. You'd think ... aw, forget it.